Citation

Kang HG, Lipsitz LA. J. Neurophysiol. 2010; 104(6): 3510-3517.

Affiliation

1California State Polytechnic University, Pomona.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2010, American Physiological Society)

DOI

10.1152/jn.00820.2009

PMID

20844110

PMCID

PMC3007648

Abstract

Distractions affect postural control, but this mechanism is not well understood. Diversion of resources during cognitive stress may lead to decreased motor drive and postural muscle tone. This may appear as decreased postural stiffness, and increased postural sway amplitude. We hypothesized that dual tasking leads to decreased stiffness and increased sway amplitude. Postural sway (center of pressure; COP) data were used from 724 participants aged 77.9±5.3 years, a representative sample of community-dwelling older adults, the MOBILIZE Boston Study cohort. Subjects stood barefoot with eyes open for 30 seconds per trial on a force plate. Five trials were performed each with and without a serial subtractions-by-3 task. Sway data were fit to a damped oscillator inverted pendulum model. Amplitudes (COP and center of mass), mechanical stiffness, and damping of the sway behavior were determined. Sway amplitudes and damping increased with the dual task (P<0.001); stiffness decreased only mediolaterally (P<0.001). Those with difficulty doing the dual task exhibited larger sway and less damping mediolaterally (P≤0.001), and an increased stiffness with dual task anteroposteriorly (interaction P=0.004). Dual task could still independently explain increases in sway (P<0.001) after accounting for stiffness changes. Thus the hypothesis was supported only in mediolateral sway. The simple model helped to explain the dual task related increase of sway only mediolaterally. It also elucidated the differential influence of cognitive function on the mechanics of anteroposterior and mediolateral sway behaviors. Dual task may divert the resources necessary for mediolateral postural control, thus leading to falls.

Language: en