Citation

Witvliet M, Olthof T, Hoeksma JB, Goossens FA, Smits MSI, Koot HM. Soc. Dev. 2010; 19(2): 285-303.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2010, John Wiley and Sons)

DOI

10.1111/j.1467-9507.2009.00544.x

PMID

unavailable

Abstract

To understand children's peer group affiliation, this study examined to what extent children in naturally occurring groups resemble each other on bullying, likeability, and perceived popularity. Participants were fourth‐ to sixth‐grade pupils (N = 461). Peer groups were identified using the social cognitive map procedure. Resemblance on bullying, likeability, and perceived popularity was evaluated by means of variance components models. Resemblance in peer groups was strongest for perceived popularity, followed by bullying and likeability. Moreover, resemblance on bullying could for a large part be attributed to the high‐perceived popularity of the group, and to a lesser extent, to the low likeability of the group. It is concluded that children showing bullying seem to affiliate with each other most of all to attain or maintain their position in a perceived popular peer group. Results stress the importance of considering the functionality of bullying from a group perspective.