|
Abstract
|
The traditional "well-earned reputation" theory explains prejudice entirely from stimulus characteristics of the groups, but is wrong in assuming that reputations are always accurate or well-deserved. The new scapegoat theory of prejudice pays attention only to motivation of the majority group. Frustration generates hostility, which is displaced to a defenseless minority group and rationalized by blaming the minority for misfortunes, by projecting bad traits on them, and by stereotyping all members of the minority. The theory fails to explain why certain minorities are chosen for prejudice while others are admired, and why minorities are also prejudiced. There is need for accurate study of characteristics of each group which antagonize others. In addition to scapegoating it is likely that conscious values and philosophies contribute to prejudice. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2006 APA, all rights reserved)
|