Citation

Dalton VK, Haefner HK, Reed BD, Senapati S, Cook A. J. Reprod. Med. 2002; 47(10): 829-834.

Affiliation

Departments of Obstetrics and Gynecology and of Family Medicine, University of Michigan Hospitals, Ann Arbor, MI, USA. daltonvk@med.umich.edu

Copyright

(Copyright © 2002, Science Printers and Publishers, Inc)

DOI

unavailable

PMID

12418066

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To examine the prevalence of physical or sexual violence victimization among women referred to a specialty clinic for management of vulvar dysesthesia/vestibulodynia as compared to a healthy gynecology clinic population. STUDY DESIGN: The subjects in this case-control study were women who had completed routine questionnaires prior to presentation to the University of Michigan Center for Vulvar Diseases. Study subjects were all given a diagnosis of vulvar dysesthesia/vestibulodynia. Women without complaints of vulvar pain presenting to a gynecology clinic were enrolled as controls. Information was obtained from the control subjects using a questionnaire similar to the history forms completed by the study group. RESULTS: Comparisons were made between 242 patients with vulvar dysesthesia/vestibulodynia presenting to a specialty clinic and 113 controls. Cases were more likely to be Caucasian, to be married and to have a higher household income than controls but reported less drug or alcohol abuse and a lower frequency of sexual intercourse. After controlling for possible confounders, no relationship between sexual assault and the presence of vulvar dysesthesia/vestibulitis was found. CONCLUSION: The prevalence of victimization was not higher in patients with vulvar dysesthesia/vestibulodynia as compared to the control population after controlling for potential confounding variables.

Language: en