Citation

Wood PJ. Int. Polit. Sociol. 2007; 1(3): 222-239.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2007, International Studies Association, Publisher John Wiley and Sons)

DOI

10.1111/j.1749-5687.2007.00015.x

PMID

unavailable

Abstract

For a generation, students of comparative public policy and international politics have argued that global market discipline and the increasing mobility of international “best practices” have given rise to policy convergence at the global level. This paper uses the American case to investigate some of the forces thought to have given rise to the spread of private prisons. It finds that while there are prisons in a number of countries, the evidence of convergence is thin and seems to suggest that the core of the prison privatization is in the American South. It then examines several theories—the political economy of the prison boom and overcrowding, globalization theory, the politics of the new right and the idea of a “prison-industrial complex”—that have been used to explain prison privatization and the extent to which they are consistent with the empirical pattern. Each takes us some way to understanding that pattern, but none can provide a clear theoretical mapping.