SAFETYLIT WEEKLY UPDATE

We compile citations and summaries of about 400 new articles every week.
RSS Feed

HELP: Tutorials | FAQ
CONTACT US: Contact info

Search Results

Journal Article

Citation

Spital A, Jacobs CL. Clin. Transplant. 2007; 21(4): 435-440.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2007, Munksgaard)

DOI

10.1111/j.1399-0012.2007.00746.x

PMID

unavailable

Abstract

In a recent opinion piece, Nancy Scheper-Hughes provides a sweeping indictment of living organ donation, even in cases where the gift is directed to a close family member. She describes the process with caustic powerful phrases such as “sacrificial violence” and a “call to ‘self-sacrifice.’” She concludes that living organ donation “should be consigned to a back seat as an exceptional back-up to deceased donation.” But her conclusions are based on anecdotes and data that are not representative of donor practice and motivation in the United States and other developed countries. At reputable transplant centers great care is taken to identify genuine volunteers and to protect their interests. Under these circumstances living organ donation remains a generally safe and beneficial procedure for the donor as well as the recipient, and a wonderful example of the goodness of people.

NEW SEARCH


All SafetyLit records are available for automatic download to Zotero & Mendeley
Print