Citation

Strauss D, Shavelle R, DeVivo MJ, Day S. J. Insur. Med. 2000; 32(4): 217-225.

Affiliation

Department of Statistics, University of California, Riverside, CA 92521-0138, USA.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2000, American Academy of Insurance Medicine)

DOI

unavailable

PMID

16104369

Abstract

Our knowledge of mortality risks comes largely from longitudinal (cohort) studies. The most commonly used analytic tool is the Cox proportional hazards model for survival analysis. An alternative approach is a simple cross-sectional analysis of person-years. The key to the method is logistic regression, where the outcome variable is lived/died in the given year and the explanatory variables are age, sex, and other potential risk factors. This approach can be used to model any dichotomous outcome and has several important advantages over the more traditional survival analysis. As an example, we compare the two methods using a large data base of patients with spinal cord injury.

Language: en