SAFETYLIT WEEKLY UPDATE

We compile citations and summaries of about 400 new articles every week.
RSS Feed

HELP: Tutorials | FAQ
CONTACT US: Contact info

Search Results

Journal Article

Citation

Di Monaco M, Vallero F, Di Monaco R, Mautino F, Cavanna A. Clin. Rheumatol. 2004; 23(1): 6-10.

Affiliation

Presidio Sanitario San Camillo, Centro Studio Osteoporosi, Strada Santa Margherita 136, 10131, Torino, Italy. Medici@h-sancamillo.to.it

Copyright

(Copyright © 2004, Holtzbrinck Springer Nature Publishing Group)

DOI

10.1007/s10067-003-0750-1

PMID

14749973

Abstract

Many observations support the view that there are significant differences between patients sustaining trochanteric fractures and those sustaining cervical fractures of the hip. Our aim was to evaluate the association between soft tissue composition (fat and lean compartments) and the type of hip fracture sustained. Of 120 consecutive women affected by their first hip fracture admitted to our rehabilitation hospital 102 were included in this cross-sectional study. Body composition was assessed by DXA. Body fat mass was lower in the women with trochanteric fracture than in those with cervical fracture (difference between groups: 2.86 kg; 95% CI 0.10-5.61 kg; p=0.042). The percentage of fat was 30.75+/-8.77 (mean+/-SD) versus 34.75+/-7.29 (difference between groups: 4.00; 95% CI 0.84-7.16; p=0.014). In contrast, no meaningful differences in body lean mass were shown between the two groups. Logistic multiple regression showed that fat mass was associated with the type of fracture independently of age, height, weight, time between fracture occurrence and DEXA assessment, comorbidity, number of drugs in use, lean mass and bone mineral content. The logistic regression results were similar when fat percentage was substituted for fat mass. The data show that fat but not lean body mass is associated with the type of hip fracture, contributing to the definition of the differences between patients sustaining cervical or trochanteric fractures. We stress the importance of distinguishing the two types of fracture when clinical or epidemiological studies related to body composition, including those regarding nutrition or physical exercise, are performed.


Language: en

NEW SEARCH


All SafetyLit records are available for automatic download to Zotero & Mendeley
Print