SAFETYLIT WEEKLY UPDATE

We compile citations and summaries of about 400 new articles every week.
RSS Feed

HELP: Tutorials | FAQ
CONTACT US: Contact info

Search Results

Journal Article

Citation

Rippey JJ, Rippey E, Branch WR. S. Afr. Med. J. 1976; 50(46): 1872-1876.

Copyright

(Copyright © 1976, South African Medical Association)

DOI

unavailable

PMID

996688

Abstract

Case records of persons with snakebite treated at the Johannesburg General Hospital and the Transvaal Memorial Children's Hospital during the 10-year period 1963-1972 were investigated. It was concluded that (i) snakebites were rare, since only 39 cases were recorded, none of which ended fatally; (ii) 86% of patients were men (mean age was 24 years); (iii) 80% of bites were on the hand and arm; (iv) 28% of patients had had previous snakebites; and (v) 60% of bites were 'illegitimate', i.e. they occurred in snake handlers. Apart from occasional bites by exotic snakes in collections, the venomous snakes responsible for the majority of bites were, in order; ringhals, puff adder, and burrowing adder. The first two snakes are common in the region, while amateur herpetologists are at particular risk of being bitten by burrowing adders because of the snake's ability to bite even when held by the back of the neck. Ringhals bites, although the most common, caused virtually no morbidity. Bites by other venomous snakes showed considerable variation in morbidity, suggesting that many different factors must be taken into account when the nature and effects of snakebite are assessed. Eighty-five per cent of snakes were positively identified, mostly by the snake fanciers they had bitten. This permitted specific treatment.


Language: en

NEW SEARCH


All SafetyLit records are available for automatic download to Zotero & Mendeley
Print