SAFETYLIT WEEKLY UPDATE

We compile citations and summaries of about 400 new articles every week.
RSS Feed

HELP: Tutorials | FAQ
CONTACT US: Contact info

Search Results

Journal Article

Citation

Devivo MJ, Go BK, Jackson AB. J. Spinal Cord Med. 2002; 25(4): 335-338.

Affiliation

Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, USA. devivo@uab.edu

Copyright

(Copyright © 2002, Academy of Spinal Cord Injury Professionals, Publisher Maney Publishing)

DOI

unavailable

PMID

12482178

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: An evaluation of the history, design, and status of the database of the National Spinal Cord Injury Statistical Center (NSCISC) was undertaken to identify its continued relevance. RESEARCH DESIGN: A systematic review was conducted of goals, content, and quality control procedures, as well as its suitability and public availability for conducting future epidemiologic and health services research. RESULTS: The NSCISC database contains information on approximately 29,000 persons injured since 1973 and treated at any regional model spinal cord injury system within 1 year of injury. The NSCISC database is structured longitudinally with data collected at discharge, 1 year after injury, 5 years after injury, and every 5 years thereafter. The database includes information on demographics, injury severity, medical complications, surgical procedures, types and amounts of therapy, length of stay, charges, and both short-term and long-term treatment outcomes. Strengths include large sample size, use of valid and reliable measures, geographic and patient diversity, comprehensiveness, availability of long-term prospective follow-up information, good case identification, and rigorous quality control procedures. Limitations include lack of population basis, inclusion of only model system patients, losses to follow-up, and other missing data. Recent content additions include detailed information on each treatment phase, depression, substance abuse, environmental barriers to community integration, and patient identifying information. A process exists for researchers to gain access to the data. CONCLUSIONS: The database remains a valuable resource. Future plans include linkage to other databases to enhance research capability, a published research compendium, and development of a user's guide to facilitate database usage.


Language: en

NEW SEARCH


All SafetyLit records are available for automatic download to Zotero & Mendeley
Print