SAFETYLIT WEEKLY UPDATE

We compile citations and summaries of about 400 new articles every week.
RSS Feed

HELP: Tutorials | FAQ
CONTACT US: Contact info

Search Results

Journal Article

Citation

Yokota M, Berglund LG, Santee WR, Buller MJ, Karis AJ, Roberts W, Cuddy JS, Ruby BC, Hoyt RW. J. Strength Cond. Res. 2012; 26(Suppl 2): S37-S44.

Affiliation

1US Army Research Institute of Environmental Medicine (USARIEM), Natick, MA, USA 2Defence Science and Technology Organization (DSTO), Victoria, Australia 3The Montana Center for Work Physiology and Exercise Metabolism, University of Montana, Missoula, MT, USA.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2012, National Strength and Conditioning Association)

DOI

10.1519/JSC.0b013e31825ceba4

PMID

22614223

Abstract

A real-time thermoregulatory model using non-invasive measurements as inputs was developed for predicting physiological responses of individuals working long hours. The purpose of the model is to reduce heat related injuries and illness by predicting the physiological effects of thermal stress on individuals while working. The model (Comput Biol Med 38: 1187-1193. 2008) was originally validated mainly by using data from controlled laboratory studies. The present study expands the validation of the model with field data from 26 test volunteers, including US Marines, Australian soldiers, and US wildland fire fighters (WLFF). These data encompass a range of environmental conditions (air temperature: 19°C - 30°C; relative humidity: 25% - 63%) and clothing (i.e., battle dress uniform, chemical-biological protective garment, WLFF protective gear), while performing diverse activities (e.g., marksmanship, marching, extinguishing fires, and digging). The predicted core temperatures (Tc), calculated using environmental, anthropometric, clothing, and heart rate measures collected in the field as model inputs, were compared with subjects' Tc collected with ingested telemetry temperature pills. Root mean square deviation (RMSD) values, used for goodness of fit comparisons, indicated that overall, the model predictions were in close agreement with the measured values (grand mean of RMSD: 0.15°C - 0.38°C). Although the field data showed more individual variability in the physiological data relative to more controlled laboratory studies, this study showed that the performance of the model was adequate.


Language: en

NEW SEARCH


All SafetyLit records are available for automatic download to Zotero & Mendeley
Print