SAFETYLIT WEEKLY UPDATE

We compile citations and summaries of about 400 new articles every week.
RSS Feed

HELP: Tutorials | FAQ
CONTACT US: Contact info

Search Results

Journal Article

Citation

Ehrensaft MK, Moffitt TE, Caspi A. J. Abnorm. Psychol. 2004; 113(2): 258-270.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2004, American Psychological Association)

DOI

10.1037/0021-843X.113.2.258

PMID

unavailable

Abstract

In an unselected birth cohort (N=980, age 24-26 years), individuals in abusive relationships causing injury and/or official intervention (9% prevalence) were compared with participants reporting physical abuse without clinical consequences and with control participants who reported no abuse, on current characteristics and prospective developmental risks. In nonclinically abusive relationships, perpetrators were primarily women. In clinically abusive relationships, men and women used physical abuse, although more women needed medical treatment for injury. Women in clinically abusive relationships had childhood family adversity, adolescent conduct problems, and aggressive personality; men had disinhibitory psychopathology since childhood and extensive personality deviance. These findings counter the hibitory assumption that if clinical abuse was ascertained in epidemiological samples, it would be primarily man-to-woman, explained by patriarchy rather than psychopathology. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2012 APA, all rights reserved) KW: partner violence

NEW SEARCH


All SafetyLit records are available for automatic download to Zotero & Mendeley
Print