Citation

Matthews R. Theor. Criminol. 2009; 13(3): 341-362.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2009, SAGE Publishing)

DOI

10.1177/1362480609336497

PMID

unavailable

Abstract

There has been a growing concern about the lack of policy relevance of criminology in recent years. Two influential responses to this dilemma have been presented. On one hand, it has been argued that academic criminologists should become more active in mobilizing points of consensus about what works, while on the other hand it has been suggested that there should be a division of labour among academics and that the subject be broken down into public, professional, policy and critical criminologies. This article argues that neither of these responses are tenable and instead calls for an approach that links theory, method and intervention with the aim of developing a coherent critical realist approach that is able to go beyond the existing forms of 'so what?' criminology.

Language: en