Citation

Trinch S. Dialect. Anthropol. 2010; 34(2): 179-204.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2010, Springer)

DOI

10.1007/s10624-009-9105-x

PMID

unavailable

Abstract

This article compares the textual production of legal testimony with that of literary testimonio . Using the controversy sparked by David Stoll's exposé of Rigoberta Menchú's less than "factual" account of her life lived amidst the genocide of indigenous peoples in Guatemala, the analysis asks why Menchú should be indicted or acquitted based on cultural notions of legal testimony. I use the concept of language ideologies to explore how listeners hold narrators to standards of truth. By suggesting that there are interpretive ideologies of narrative production and function at work, the argument is made that any detractor can find a way to discredit narrative truth. I show this by examining how Latina women and state actors create legal testimony about domestic abuse. While these narratives share much with the Menchú testimonio , in particular the risks they present to their narrators, I conclude that the everyday victim in the U.S. adversarial system has much more to lose, and inevitably has far less discursive power, than Menchú. I examine these topics and themes from sociolinguistic and discourse analytic perspectives.