SAFETYLIT WEEKLY UPDATE

We compile citations and summaries of about 400 new articles every week.
RSS Feed

HELP: Tutorials | FAQ
CONTACT US: Contact info

Search Results

Journal Article

Citation

de Bruin ED, van Het Reve E, Murer K. Clin. Rehabil. 2013; 27(3): 215-225.

Affiliation

Institute of Human Movement Sciences and Sport, Department Health Sciences and Technology, ETH Zurich, CH, Switzerland.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2013, SAGE Publishing)

DOI

10.1177/0269215512453352

PMID

22865831

Abstract

Objective:(1) To develop a motor-cognition training programme; (2) to evaluate the ability to recruit and retain elderly people; (3) to assess the effects of the interventions.Design:Pilot randomized controlled trial.Setting:Assisted living facility.Participants:Sixteen subjects (11 female) living in an assisted living facility were randomized to a motor or motor-cognition group.Interventions:Both groups received machine-driven strength training and balance exercises for 45 minutes, twice weekly, for 12 weeks. In addition, the motor-cognition group received computerized training for attention 3-5 times per week for 10 weeks.Main outcome measures:Baseline and post-intervention (12 weeks) assessments focused on recruitment, attrition and adherence. Secondary outcome measures assessed dual-task costs of gait (velocity, cadence, step time, step length), expanded timed get-up-and-go, falls efficacy and reaction time.Results:Of 35 subjects initially approached, 16 started and 14 completed the study, resulting in 46% recruitment, 19% attrition and >80% adherence rates. There is more evidence of altered levels in the motor-cognitive treatment group with significant differences in average change for fear of falling (P = 0.017) and foot reaction time (P = 0.046). No statistical significance was reached for gait parameters.Conclusions:Motor-cognition training is feasible and shows trends to stronger improvement in walking and reaction time. The application in a main study is deemed feasible. A minimum of ±55 subjects per group are required to achieve a power of 80% at the 5% level of significance based on step length and considering the expectable attrition rate in a required larger scale study.


Language: en

NEW SEARCH


All SafetyLit records are available for automatic download to Zotero & Mendeley
Print