SAFETYLIT WEEKLY UPDATE

We compile citations and summaries of about 400 new articles every week.
RSS Feed

HELP: Tutorials | FAQ
CONTACT US: Contact info

Search Results

Journal Article

Citation

Shipp KM. Curr. Osteoporos. Rep. 2006; 4(4): 129-133.

Affiliation

Division of Physical Therapy, Department of Community and Family Medicine, Duke University Medical Center, Box 3907, Durham, NC 27710, USA. kathy.shipp@duke.edu

Copyright

(Copyright © 2006, Current Science)

DOI

unavailable

PMID

17112422

Abstract

The "holy grail" of inquiry regarding exercise and osteoporosis has been identifying a type of exercise that builds bone. Investigation using animal models has provided many insights into how bone responds to mechanical loading, but translating these findings into an exercise prescription for patients with osteoporosis is difficult. Patients expect bone to respond to exercise in a linear fashion, such as they are accustomed to experiencing with muscles in response to progressive strength training or with the cardiopulmonary system in response to endurance training. If the skeleton accrued greater mass in response to increasing intensity and duration of mechanical strain, our bones would weigh so much that we could not move. A unique requirement of bone is that adaptations to loading produce the strongest and the lightest structure. More exercise is not always better, but we are not yet sure exactly what and how much is enough and what and how much is too much. This complexity stymies clear communication, both in the clinic and in public health initiatives.


Language: en

NEW SEARCH


All SafetyLit records are available for automatic download to Zotero & Mendeley
Print