SAFETYLIT WEEKLY UPDATE

We compile citations and summaries of about 400 new articles every week.
RSS Feed

HELP: Tutorials | FAQ
CONTACT US: Contact info

Search Results

Journal Article

Citation

Guastaferro WP, Daigle LE. J. Drug Iss. 2012; 42(4): 396-419.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2012, Florida State University, School of Criminology and Criminal Justice)

DOI

10.1177/0022042612461773

PMID

unavailable

Abstract

Drug courts are charged with positively influencing the behavior of a difficult-to-treat population. Sanctions represent a drug court's efforts to instill accountability in participants, an important component of behavior modification. This research examined the application of sanctions within a drug court's proactive supervision model and sanctions matrix. An exploratory analysis of individual-level factors (including risk level, treatment characteristics, and punishment history) that increase the likelihood of receiving a sanction was conducted. Factors related to receiving any type of sanction and a drug sanction, and whether receiving a sanction was related to program retention were examined. Most participants (71%) received a sanction. On average, each participant received 4 sanctions and 259 sanctions were given over a 2-year period. The majority of people (77%) continued to be actively enrolled after receiving a sanction. Practice and policy implications regarding the use of sanctions within the context of offender change are discussed.


Language: en

NEW SEARCH


All SafetyLit records are available for automatic download to Zotero & Mendeley
Print