Citation

Adams GS, Mullen E. Soc. Justice Res. 2013; 26(2): 168-192.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2013, Holtzbrinck Springer Nature Publishing Group)

DOI

10.1007/s11211-013-0179-x

PMID

unavailable

Abstract

Three studies demonstrate that people are more likely to vote for political candidates who respond to injustice in a compensatory rather than punitive manner. Participants were more likely to vote for candidates who responded to various transgressions (the Darfur crisis, campus bike theft, and domestic violence) by compensating victims (or simultaneously compensating victims and punishing perpetrators) rather than solely punishing the perpetrator or not responding. Furthermore, participants' perceptions of candidates' warmth (but not competence) mediated the relationship between punishing versus compensating and voting.

Language: en