SAFETYLIT WEEKLY UPDATE

We compile citations and summaries of about 400 new articles every week.
RSS Feed

HELP: Tutorials | FAQ
CONTACT US: Contact info

Search Results

Journal Article

Citation

O'Connor PE, Connor NA, Jones DW, McCauley ME, Buttrey SE. Int. J. Hum. Factors Ergon. 2012; 1(1): 21.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2012, Inderscience Publishers)

DOI

10.1504/IJHFE.2012.045272

PMID

unavailable

Abstract

The US Navy's Crew Resource Management (CRM) training programme has not been evaluated within the last decade. Reactions were evaluated by analysing 51,570 responses to an item pertaining to CRM that is part of a safety climate survey. A total of 172 responses were obtained on a knowledge test. The attitudes of 553 naval aviators were assessed using an attitudes questionnaire. The CRM mishap rate from 1997 until 2007 was evaluated. It was found that naval aviators appear to think than CRM training is useful, are generally knowledgeable of, and display positive attitudes towards, the concepts addressed in the training. However, there is a lack of evidence to support the view that CRM training is having an effect on the mishap rate. As the next generation of highly automated aircraft becomes part of naval aviation, there is a need to ensure that CRM training evolves to meet this new challenge.

KEYWORDS: crew resource management; CRM; training evaluation; safety; naval aviation; US Navy; automated aircraft; mishap rate; accidents; mishaps; naval aircraft.

NEW SEARCH


All SafetyLit records are available for automatic download to Zotero & Mendeley
Print