Citation

Koelega HS, Brinkman JA, Hendriks L, Verbaten MN. Hum. Factors 1989; 31(1): 45-62.

Copyright

(Copyright © 1989, Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, Publisher SAGE Publishing)

DOI

unavailable

PMID

2707818

Abstract

In an attempt to specify the limiting conditions of the taxonomy of vigilance tasks, four tasks differing in memory load and in stimuli employed (sensory or cognitive) were compared. Electrodermal activity and subjective measures were used to determine the investment of effort. The data show that vigilance level and vigilance decrement dissociate. The level seems to relate to effort demand and investment; the decrement seems to be task driven, determined mainly by the type of stimuli used. Tasks employing unfamiliar stimuli showed a decline in sensitivity; "cognitive" tasks employing alphanumeric stimuli did not. Principal components analyses suggest that measures of speed and accuracy may reflect relatively independent systems. Subjective data showed that good performers expand more effort in difficult and complex tasks. Effortful processing seems to prevent rather than induce a decline in efficiency.