Citation

Schneider JM. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol. 2014; 6(11): a017731.

Affiliation

Zoological Institute & Museum, Biocentre Grindel, University of Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2014, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press)

DOI

10.1101/cshperspect.a017731

PMID

25213095

Abstract

Sexual cannibalism is a well-known example for sexual conflict and has many facets that determine the costs and benefits for the cannibal and the victim. Here, I focus on species in which sexual cannibalism is a general component of a mating system in which males invest maximally in mating with a single (monogyny) or two (bigyny) females. Sexual cannibalism can be a male strategy to maximize paternity and a female strategy to prevent paternity monopolization by any or a particular male. Considerable variation exists between species (1) in the potential of males to monopolize females, and (2) in the success of females in preventing monopolization by males. This opens up exciting future possibilities to investigate sexually antagonistic coevolution in a largely unstudied mating system.

Language: en