SAFETYLIT WEEKLY UPDATE

We compile citations and summaries of about 400 new articles every week.
RSS Feed

HELP: Tutorials | FAQ
CONTACT US: Contact info

Search Results

Journal Article

Citation

Smith GCS, Lincoln AE, Wong TY, Bell NS, Vinger PF, Amoroso PJ, Lombardi DA. J. Occup. Environ. Med. 2005; 47(6): 640-648.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2005, Lippincott Williams and Wilkins)

DOI

10.1097/01.jom.0000165746.26873.d1

PMID

unavailable

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: We sought to determine whether demographic differences in eye injury rates persist after adjusting for occupational exposure.

METHODS: On-duty eye injury hospitalizations were linked to occupation among active-duty US Army personnel.

RESULTS: Eye injury rates were higher for white solidiers, men, and for younger soldiers, even after adjusting for occupational group and specific job titles using multivariate models.

CONCLUSIONS: This finding contrasts with studies of other injuries, suggesting that occupation does not fully account for variations in eye injury risk. Because protective eyewear can prevent most serious eye injuries, we hypothesize that differences in protective eyewear use between men and women may contribute to differences in eye injury rates, although follow-up studies are needed to confirm this. Prevention efforts should consider targeting high-risk demographic groups in addition to high-risk occupations.


Language: en

NEW SEARCH


All SafetyLit records are available for automatic download to Zotero & Mendeley
Print