Citation

van Krimpen L. Justitiele Verkenn. 2010; 36(7): 56-67.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2010, Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek- en Documentatiecentrum)

DOI

unavailable

PMID

unavailable

Abstract

This article describes the developments in jurisprudence on human trafficking in sectors other than the sex industry. In October 2009, the Supreme Court for the first time ruled in a case about human trafficking outside the sex industry. Whereas the number of cases before the Supreme Court ruling was limited, with only a few convictions for this type of exploitation, and with differences in the way courts interpreted the legal definition, this has changed tremendously after this ruling. The Supreme Court, in the case about exploitation in a Chinese restaurant, gave a very clear interpretation on the elements 'intention of exploitation' and the means 'abuse of a vulnerable position'. Following the Supreme Court ruling, the number of cases has increased, as well as the number of convictions for this type of exploitation. Among these cases are also cases of criminal exploitation. It is not completely clear yet what type of behaviour falls within the scope of criminal exploitation.

Keywords: Human trafficking