SAFETYLIT WEEKLY UPDATE

We compile citations and summaries of about 400 new articles every week.
RSS Feed

HELP: Tutorials | FAQ
CONTACT US: Contact info

Search Results

Journal Article

Citation

Huey ED, Lee S, Lieberman JA, Devanand DP, Brickman AM, Raymont V, Krueger F, Grafman J. J. Neuropsychiatry Clin. Neurosci. 2015; 28(2): 104-111.

Affiliation

From the Taub Institute and Gertrude H. Sergievsky Center, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY (EDH, AMB), Division of Geriatric Psychiatry, Dept. of Psychiatry, Columbia University, College of Physicians and Surgeons and New York State Psychiatric Institute, New York, NY (EDH, DPD), Dept. of Neurology, Columbia University, College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, NY (EDH, AMB), Dept. of Psychiatry, Columbia University, College of Physicians and Surgeons and New York State Psychiatric Institute, Columbia University, New York, NY (EDH, SL, JAL, DPD), Dept. of Biostatistics, Columbia University, Mailman School of Public Health, New York, NY (SL), Cognitive Neuroscience Division, Dept. of Neurology, Columbia University, College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, NY (AMB), Imperial College London, Dept. of Medicine, London, UK (VR), Dept. of Radiology, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD (VR), Molecular Neuroscience Dept., George Mason University, Fairfax, VA (FK), Dept. of Psychology, George Mason University, Fairfax, VA (FK), Brain Injury Research Program, Rehabilitation Institute of Chicago, Chicago, IL (JG), and Dept. of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL (JG).

Copyright

(Copyright © 2015, American Neuropsychiatric Association, Publisher American Psychiatric Publishing)

DOI

10.1176/appi.neuropsych.15060150

PMID

26715034

Abstract

A factor structure underlying DSM-IV diagnoses has been previously reported in neurologically intact patients. The authors determined the brain regions associated with factors underlying DSM-IV diagnoses and compared the ability of DSM-IV diagnoses, factor scores, and self-report measures to account for the neuroanatomical findings in patients with penetrating brain injuries. This prospective cohort study included 254 Vietnam War veterans: 199 with penetrating brain injuries and 55 matched control participants. Measures include DSM-IV diagnoses (from a Structured Clinical Interview for DSM), self-report measures of depression and anxiety, and CT scans. Factors underlying DSM-IV diagnoses were determined using an exploratory factor analysis and correlated with percent of brain regions affected. The ability of the factor scores, DSM-IV diagnoses, and the self-report psychiatric measures to account for the anatomical variance was compared with multiple regressions. Internalizing and externalizing factors were identified in these brain-injured patients. Damage to the left amygdala and bilateral basal ganglia was associated with lower internalizing factor scores, and damage to the left medial orbitofrontal cortex (OFC) with higher, and bilateral hippocampi with lower, externalizing factor scores. Factor scores best predicted left amygdala and bilateral hippocampal involvement, whereas DSM-IV diagnoses best predicted bilateral basal ganglia and left OFC involvement. Damage to the limbic areas involved in the processing of emotional and reward information, including structures involved in the National Institute of Mental Health's Research Domain Criteria Negative Valence Domain, influences the development of internalizing and externalizing psychiatric symptoms. Self-report measures underperformed DSM-IV and factor scores in predicting neuroanatomical findings.


Language: en

NEW SEARCH


All SafetyLit records are available for automatic download to Zotero & Mendeley
Print