SAFETYLIT WEEKLY UPDATE

We compile citations and summaries of about 400 new articles every week.
RSS Feed

HELP: Tutorials | FAQ
CONTACT US: Contact info

Search Results

Journal Article

Citation

Williams R, Heinemann A, Neumann HD, Fann JR, Forchheimer M, Richardson E, Bombardier CH. Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 2016; 97(6): 929-937.

Affiliation

Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Washington School of Medicine, Box 359612 Harborview Medical Center, 325 9(th) Ave, Seattle WA 98104, USA. Electronic address: chb@uw.edu.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2016, Elsevier Publishing)

DOI

10.1016/j.apmr.2016.01.017

PMID

26859610

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To compare the measurement properties and responsiveness to change of the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9), the Hopkins Symptom Checklist (HSCL-20) and the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAM-D) in people with spinal cord injury (SCI) diagnosed with major depressive disorder (MDD).

DESIGN: Secondary analysis of depression symptoms measured at 6 occasions over 12 weeks as part of a randomized control trial of venlafaxine XR for MDD in persons with SCI. SETTING: Outpatient and community settings. PARTICIPANTS: 133 individuals consented and completed the drug trial. Eligibility criteria were age at least 18 years old; traumatic SCI; and diagnosis of MDD. INTERVENTION: venlafaxine XR. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Patients completed the PHQ-9 and the HSCL-20 depression scales; clinical investigators completed the HAM-D and the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV Depression Module (SCID-D), which was used as a diagnostic criterion measure.

RESULTS: All 3 instruments were improved with rating scale analysis. The HSCL-20 and HAM-D contained items that misfit the underlying construct and that correlated weakly with the total measures. Removing these items improved the internal consistency with floor effects increasing slightly. The HAM-D correlated most strongly with SCID-D diagnoses. Depression improvement was similar on all measures in both treatment and control groups.

CONCLUSIONS: The psychometric properties of the revised depression instruments are more than adequate for routine use in adults with SCI and are responsive to clinical improvement. The PHQ-9 is the simplest instrument, with measurement properties as good as or better than those of the other instruments and requiring the fewest modifications.


Language: en

NEW SEARCH


All SafetyLit records are available for automatic download to Zotero & Mendeley
Print