Citation

Levine M, Flores J, Seabury SA, Sanko S, Eckstein M. J. Med. Toxicol. 2016; 13(1): 47-51.

Affiliation

Department of Emergency Medicine, Division of Emergency Medical Services, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2016, Holtzbrinck Springer Nature Publishing Group)

DOI

10.1007/s13181-016-0586-0

PMID

27718162

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The public commonly calls 911 for unintentional ingestions, rather than calling the local poison center. By utilizing a series of scripted questions, 911 dispatchers in Los Angeles determine if an ingestion meets "omega-1" classification. Under such circumstances, the regional poison center is contacted prior to dispatch of paramedics. If the poison center advises that the patient can remain at home, EMS is not dispatched and the patient is followed at home by the poison center. The primary objective is to determine the number of averted transports through involvement of a poison center. A secondary objective is to determine the potential costs and charges saved with the use of such a strategy.

METHODS: A retrospective review of all overdose calls with an "omega-1" classification to a single EMS system between 1/2008-6/2012. Each call culminating in an EMS dispatch was subsequently reviewed by two additional reviewers. The cost savings was determined by utilizing data from the Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS) from 2000 to 2010. Monetary values were adjusted to 2012 dollars.

RESULTS: Three hundred eighteen cases received "omega-1" dispatch classification. EMS was dispatched 19 times (5.98 %), and 11 patients (3.46 %) were ultimately transported. The most common reasons for transport were ambiguity over the ingested agent or amount, and caller insistence. Using these estimates, routine consultation of a regional poison center as part of EMS dispatch averted $486,595 in charges, and $183,279 in payments.

CONCLUSIONS: Routine consultation of a poison center by emergency medical dispatchers can reduce unnecessary dispatches, ambulance transports, and ED visits with significant associated cost savings.

Language: en