Citation

Holody KJ, Daniel ES. Journal. Pract. 2017; 11(1): 80-100.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2017, Informa - Taylor and Francis Group)

DOI

10.1080/17512786.2015.1121786

PMID

unavailable

Abstract

The present study examined frames and second-level agenda-setting attributes used by national and local newspapers to cover the 2012 Aurora, Colorado shootings. Unlike research examining coverage of school shootings, this study examined a mass shooting that did not occur at a school. Both newspaper types published a similar number of articles-though national articles tended to be longer-and virtually stopped coverage after 18 days. While previous coverage tended to focus on shootings' societal implications, Aurora coverage focused more on individuals involved in the time immediately surrounding the shootings. National papers focused on the gunman, while the local press tended to focus on victims. Mass shootings in general tend to be salient news items, but the present study further shows news outlets may now focus on incidents' specifics instead of common characteristics they might share, perhaps because audiences have an existing understanding of them. The shootings were framed in terms of gun control; national newspapers used this frame more often than did local newspapers. Both newspaper types tended to discuss gun control as directly related to the Aurora shootings, rather than as a societal or continuing need.

RESULTS offer further evidence that second-level agenda-setting and framing are distinct concepts.

Language: en