Citation

Leiva-Bianchi M, Ahumada F, Araneda A, Botella J. Issues Ment. Health Nurs. 2018; 39(4): 320-327.

Affiliation

Department of Social Psychology and Methodology, Faculty of Psychology , Universidad Autónoma de Madrid , Spain.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2018, Informa - Taylor and Francis Group)

DOI

10.1080/01612840.2017.1393033

PMID

29436877

Abstract

The psychosocial impact concept improves the understanding of the effects of disasters on people and communities. However, its definition is not clear. This work explores consistencies between studies (k = 21) that refer to the psychosocial impact of disasters by way of a meta-analytic synthesis. This synthesis indicates that people are more prone to illness when they are exposed to a disaster, and less when they are protected (OR = 2.737). Please check the change conveys the intended meaning or amend Nevertheless, there are no differences in healthy responses, regardless of how protected or exposed they are (OR = 1.053). Finally, a model is proposed to explain four types of psychosocial impact: resilient, traumatic, sensitive, witness.

Language: en