SAFETYLIT WEEKLY UPDATE

We compile citations and summaries of about 400 new articles every week.
RSS Feed

HELP: Tutorials | FAQ
CONTACT US: Contact info

Search Results

Journal Article

Citation

Ota K. J. Exp. Biol. 2018; 221(Pt 7): ePub.

Affiliation

Department of Biology and Geosciences, Osaka City University, Sumiyoshi, Osaka 558-8585, Japan otkztk@gmail.com.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2018, Company of Biologists Limited)

DOI

10.1242/jeb.168047

PMID

29496778

Abstract

Fighting carries predation risk because animals have limited attention, constraining their ability to simultaneously engage in aggression and anti-predator vigilance. However,the influence of interspecific aggression and fatigue on the predation cost of fighting is seldom examined, although both are unignorable aspects of fighting. Here, I incorporated both factors in a series of field experiments on the cichlidLamprologus ocellatus.If territorial malesrespond more stronglyto conspecific territorial intruders than heterospecific intruders, then they should delay escape more frequently during intraspecific fighting than interspecific fighting. Consequently, although I predict that vigilance would be decreased as fighting progresses in both fighting, intraspecific aggression shoulddecrease vigilance more thaninterspecific aggression. Males were also exposed to a predator approaching at different(slow or fast)speeds during these fighting bouts. Delays in predator detection and flight initiation were quantified and these predictions were tested. As predicted, males wereresponded more stronglyto intraspecific intruders, resulting in slower predator detection and fleeing times than when encountering interspecific intruders. Furthermore, flight latency decreased with increasing fight duration, suggesting that fatigue negatively influenced escape responses. However, contrary to prediction, the vigilance decrement rate was faster in response to slow predators than to rapid predators, and was not influenced by intruder identity. This suggests that fighting males reserve their attention for information critical to their survival and are less vigilant toward aless-threatening (slow approaching) predatorThis cognitive allocation may be an adaptive compensation for fatigue-related low vigilance during fighting.

© 2018. Published by The Company of Biologists Ltd.


Language: en

Keywords

Cognitive trade-off; Decision-making; Interspecific competition; Intraspecific competition; Limited attention; Predation

NEW SEARCH


All SafetyLit records are available for automatic download to Zotero & Mendeley
Print