SAFETYLIT WEEKLY UPDATE

We compile citations and summaries of about 400 new articles every week.
RSS Feed

HELP: Tutorials | FAQ
CONTACT US: Contact info

Search Results

Journal Article

Citation

Keller-Margulis M, McQuillin SD, CastaƱeda JJ, Ochs S, Jones JH. J. Appl. Sch. Psychol. 2018; 34(1): 18-35.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2018, Informa - Taylor and Francis Group)

DOI

10.1080/15377903.2017.1328627

PMID

unavailable

Abstract

Multitiered systems of support depend on screening technology to identify students at risk. The purpose of this study was to examine the use of a computer-adaptive test and latent class growth analysis (LCGA) to identify students at risk in reading with focus on the use of this methodology to characterize student performance in screening. Participants included 3,699 students in Grades 3-5. Three time points of administration (fall, winter, and spring) of the computer-adaptive reading measure were selected. LCGA results indicated 6-7 classes, depending on grade, informed by level and growth in student performance that significantly predicted failure on the statewide test administered at the end of the year. The lowest-performing classes had failure rates above 90% across all grades. The results indicate that identifying homogeneous groups of learners through LCGA may be valuable as an approach to determining students who need additional instruction. Practical implications and future directions are discussed.


Language: en

Keywords

Computer-adaptive measures; latent class growth analysis; multitiered systems of support; universal screening

NEW SEARCH


All SafetyLit records are available for automatic download to Zotero & Mendeley
Print