SAFETYLIT WEEKLY UPDATE

We compile citations and summaries of about 400 new articles every week.
RSS Feed

HELP: Tutorials | FAQ
CONTACT US: Contact info

Search Results

Journal Article

Citation

Vassileva M, Tonolo FG, Riccardi P, Lecci D, Boccardo P, Chiesa G. Eur. J. Remote Sensing 2017; 50(1): 464-477.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2017, Informa - Taylor and Francis Group)

DOI

10.1080/22797254.2017.1360155

PMID

unavailable

Abstract

This paper investigates the potential of Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR) interferometry in the field of emergency mapping, assessing its suitability for both rapid mapping, aimed at supporting the immediate response phase after a disastrous event, and risk mapping, addressing risk prevention and mitigation activities. The conventional Differential Interferometric SAR technique (DInSAR) and the two currently available multi-temporal interferometric approaches, i.e. Permanent Scatterers (PS) and Small BAseline Subset (SBAS), have been evaluated focusing on the main emergency mapping requirements, namely crisis information product types, availability of optimal input data, requirements in terms of auxiliary data, processing time and expected accuracy. The aforementioned investigations have been carried out exploiting the European Space Agency (ESA) C-band Sentinel-1 mission, characterized by a free, full and open data policy. Therefore, this paper will not assess different SAR sensors and their different technical specifications, e.g. wavelength and space resolution. Representative results are presented and discussed with the aim to describe the possible interferometric product types in specific emergency mapping scenarios.


Language: en

Keywords

crisis information; DInSAR; Natural hazards; Permanent Scatterers (PS); SBAS

NEW SEARCH


All SafetyLit records are available for automatic download to Zotero & Mendeley
Print