SAFETYLIT WEEKLY UPDATE

We compile citations and summaries of about 400 new articles every week.
RSS Feed

HELP: Tutorials | FAQ
CONTACT US: Contact info

Search Results

Journal Article

Citation

Collins KM, Price OF, Penman TD. J. Environ. Manage. 2018; 228: 373-382.

Affiliation

School of Ecosystem and Forest Sciences, University of Melbourne, 4 Water St Creswick, Victoria 3363, Australia.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2018, Elsevier Publishing)

DOI

10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.09.031

PMID

30243073

Abstract

Fire agencies aim to contain wildfires before they impact on life, property and infrastructure and to reduce the risk of damage to the environment. Despite the large cost of suppression, there are few data on the success of suppression efforts under varying weather, fuel and resource scenarios. We examined over 2200 forest and 4600 grass fires in New South Wales, Australia to determine the dominant influences on the containment of wildfires. A random forest modelling approach was used to analyse the effect of a range of human and environmental factors. The number of suppression resources per area of fire were the dominant influence on the containment of both forest and grass fires. As fire weather conditions worsened the probability of containment decreased across all fires and as fuel loads and slope increased the probability of containment decreased for forest fires. Environmental controls limit the effectiveness of wildfire management. However, results suggest investment in suppression resources and strategic fuel management will increase the probability of containment.

Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.


Language: en

Keywords

Fire behaviour; Fuel management; Random forests; Suppression; Wildfire

NEW SEARCH


All SafetyLit records are available for automatic download to Zotero & Mendeley
Print