Citation

Allendoerfer MG. J. Hum. Right. 2017; 16(4): 428-451.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2017, Informa - Taylor and Francis Group)

DOI

10.1080/14754835.2015.1129603

PMID

unavailable

Abstract

Literature on foreign aid and human rights often presupposes that constituents favor using foreign policy to promote human rights abroad and lead elected policymakers to pursue such policies to retain electoral support. This assumption, although frequently asserted, has not been empirically evaluated. And there are reasons to be skeptical about whether public opinion supports human rights foreign policy compared to other policy objectives. This article explores US public opinion about human rights, by asking two questions: Does the public think human rights should factor in foreign aid decisions and does the context--the strategic or economic relationship between the donor and recipient--affect this? This article uses results from a nationwide experimental survey to evaluate these questions. I find that the majority of respondents support cutting aid to punish human rights violators and that this depends minimally on the importance of the recipient.

Language: en

Keywords

Corrigendum