Citation

Barnum TC, Solomon SJ. Criminology 2019; 57(4): 659-686.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2019, American Society of Criminology)

DOI

10.1111/1745-9125.12222

PMID

unavailable

Abstract

The effect of proximate emotions on risk perceptions is of central importance to criminal decision-making theory, but has been understudied. We investigate the role of two integral (situational specific) emotional responses, anger and fear, in a decision-making context regarding the choice to commit assault. We draw on dual-process models of information processing and appraisal theory to propose a theoretical model in which integral emotions influence decisions and behavior. Using data from an experiment embedded in a survey to a nationwide sample of adults (N = 804), we test the interrelated roles of anger, fear, and traditional rational choice considerations on the intention to commit assault. We find a strong direct association between emotions and intentions to commit assault. Additionally, anger and fear moderate the effect of cognitive deliberations on behavioral intentions and provide a lens through which to evaluate a criminogenic opportunity.

Language: en

Keywords

appraisal theory; dual-process models; incidental affect; integral affect; offender decision-making