Citation

Abrams LS, Barnert ES, Mizel ML, Bedros A, Webster E, Bryan I. Crime Delinq. 2020; 66(2): 219-249.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2020, SAGE Publishing)

DOI

10.1177/0011128719839356

PMID

unavailable

Abstract

There is a dearth of knowledge concerning statutes and practices designed to protect younger children from formal juvenile court petitions. This case study examines minimum age laws and related statutes in the six largest U.S. states and explores implementation of these policies and practices in major metropolitan areas within these states. The primary study methods included legal analysis and stakeholder interviews. Legal analysis identified diverse minimum age laws across states and complex statutes related to children's capacity to stand trial and competency. Stakeholders across the six cases agreed that the state should protect young children from formal delinquency petitions when possible. Discretionary statutes and practices appeared to play a key yet inconsistent role in excluding younger children from juvenile court.

Keywords: Juvenile justice

Language: en