Citation

Motz RT, Barnes JC, Caspi A, Arseneault L, Cullen FT, Houts R, Wertz J, Moffitt TE. Criminology 2020; 58(2): 307-335.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2020, American Society of Criminology)

DOI

10.1111/1745-9125.12236

PMID

unavailable

Abstract

What impact does formal punishment have on antisocial conduct--does it deter or promote it? The findings from a long line of research on the labeling tradition indicate formal punishments have the opposite-of-intended consequence of promoting future misbehavior. In another body of work, the results show support for deterrence-based hypotheses that punishment deters future misbehavior. So, which is it? We draw on a nationally representative sample of British adolescent twins from the Environmental Risk (E-Risk) Longitudinal Twin Study to perform a robust test of the deterrence versus labeling question. We leverage a powerful research design in which twins can serve as the counterfactual for their co-twin, thereby ruling out many sources of confounding that have likely impacted prior studies. The pattern of findings provides support for labeling theory, showing that contact with the justice system--through spending a night in jail/prison, being issued an anti-social behaviour order (ASBO), or having an official record--promotes delinquency. We conclude by discussing the impact these findings may have on criminologists' and practitioners' perspective on the role of the juvenile justice system in society.

Language: en

Keywords

delinquency; family fixed effects; labeling; specific deterrence; twins