SAFETYLIT WEEKLY UPDATE

We compile citations and summaries of about 400 new articles every week.
RSS Feed

HELP: Tutorials | FAQ
CONTACT US: Contact info

Search Results

Journal Article

Citation

Stefanska EB, Longpre N, Bloomfield S, Perkins D, Carter AJ. J. Crim. Justice 2020; 71: e101729.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2020, Elsevier Publishing)

DOI

10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2020.101729

PMID

unavailable

Abstract

PURPOSE
The study aimed to develop an empirically driven checklist guiding clinicians in the decision-making process that would enable them to determine the functional role of the killing in a newly proposed classification of sexual homicides.

Methods
Classical Test Theory, Exploratory Factor Analyses and Two-parameter item response theory were conducted on a sample of 361 male sexual killers assigned as either belonging to the direct or indirect group.

Results
The results revealed that an eight-item checklist was the best empirical solution. The items included: sexual sadism; followed by the use of sexually related disinhibitors; stalking behaviours; the use of restraints; the presence post-mortem sexual activity; the presence of other sexual activities; an unusual interest following the murder; and the presence of biting were indicative of a direct sexual homicide.

Conclusions
Using the direct/indirect typology automatically directs clinicians to consider how, and at what point in the timeline, the sexual element and the act of killing were related. This, allows to address any arising inconsistencies as well as minimise the risk of either assuming sexual motives in the killing in the indirect cases or not addressing management of sexual urges in the context of extreme violence for the direct cases.


Language: en

Keywords

Checklist; Classification; Direct/ indirect; IRT; Sexual murderers

NEW SEARCH


All SafetyLit records are available for automatic download to Zotero & Mendeley
Print