Citation

Gönültaş S, Mulvey KL, Irdam G, Goff E, Irvin MJ, Carlson R, Distefano C. J. Emot. Behav. Disord. (Austin) 2020; 28(4): 195-208.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2020, Hammill Institute on Disabilities, Publisher SAGE Publishing)

DOI

10.1177/1063426619870492

PMID

unavailable

Abstract

This study investigates how social-emotional factors are related to bystanders' responses to aggression and possible retaliation. Participants consisted of sixth and ninth graders (N = 896, 52.8% female) who indicated how likely they would be to intervene if they observed an initial aggressive act and then following retaliation. Hierarchical regression models were used to examine social-emotional predictors of bystander judgments and responses.

FINDINGS highlight that participants with high effortful control and transgressor justice sensitivity were more likely to evaluate bystander intervention as more acceptable. Furthermore, youth with higher affective empathy, sympathy, and observer justice sensitivity were more likely to report that they would engage in active bystander responses, whereas youth with higher negative affect and rejection sensitivity were more likely to report that they would engage in inactive responses to aggression. These findings have important implications for understanding how individual differences in social-emotional factors relate to bystander attitudes and responses to initial aggressive acts and to possible retribution.

Language: en

Keywords

adolescence; bystander intervention; moral judgments; peer aggression; retribution; social-emotional factors