Citation

Klein D. Hist. Reflect. 2013; 39(2): 30-39.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2013, History Dept., University of Waterloo)

DOI

10.3167/hrrh.2013.390204

PMID

unavailable

Abstract

This article looks at the significance of local circumstances, including direct encounters between victims and assailants, in the genocide process. In what scholars term "the micropolitical turn in the study of social violence," the argument here considers the encounter from the perspectives of both constituent parties. Assailants often acted before they thought, raising questions about the premise of intention and calculation that anchors the defining Article 2 in the United Nations Genocide Convention. Victims in local encounters express in their accounts a recognition of their assailants and describe what amounts to a betrayal of the trust they invested in their compatriots. Expressions of recognition in witness accounts attenuate victims' resentment and recrimination, opening a space that permitted possibilities for postgenocide reconciliation and even qualified forgiveness.

Language: en