Citation

Antunes MJL, Manasse M. J. Res. Crime Delinq. 2022; 59(1): 82-127.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2022, SAGE Publishing)

DOI

10.1177/00224278211004667

PMID

unavailable

Abstract

OBJECTIVES:Explanations of community violence traditionally reflect a social disorganization perspective, suggesting that neighborhood characteristics affect crime via the intervening mechanism of informal social control. Drawing on Agnew?s Macro Strain Theory [MST], we argue that neighborhood characteristics 1) also affect macro-level crime for reasons related to aggregated strain and 2) condition the relationship between micro-level strains and individual violent offending.

METHODS:Using data from the Project on Human Development in Chicago Neighborhoods, we conduct a series of multilevel models examining both the macro- and multi-level relationship between neighborhood characteristics, strain and youth violence.

FINDINGS:Results generally support our arguments, suggesting that neighborhood characteristics like concentrated disadvantage 1) remain associated with community violence even after adjusting for multiple measures of informal social control and 2) condition the association between micro-level strain and violent offending.

CONCLUSIONS:Strain processes, at both the macro and micro-level, play a critical role in the well-established empirical relationship between structural disadvantage and violence. In light of results, community crime control policies should address the ways in which structural disadvantage increases motivation, rather than focusing exclusively on the ways in which it weakens informal social control.

Language: en

Keywords

criminological theory; general strain theory; neighborhoods; social disorganization; strain theories; youth violence