SAFETYLIT WEEKLY UPDATE

We compile citations and summaries of about 400 new articles every week.
RSS Feed

HELP: Tutorials | FAQ
CONTACT US: Contact info

Search Results

Journal Article

Citation

van de Loo B, Seppala LJ, van der Velde N, Medlock S, Denkinger M, de Groot LCPGM, Kenny RA, Moriarty F, Rothenbacher D, Stricker B, Uitterlinden A, Abu-Hanna A, Heymans MW, van Schoor N. J. Gerontol. A Biol. Sci. Med. Sci. 2022; ePub(ePub): ePub.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2022, Gerontological Society of America)

DOI

10.1093/gerona/glac080

PMID

35380638

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Use of fall prevention strategies requires detection of high-risk patients. Our goal was to develop prediction models for falls and recurrent falls in community-dwelling older adults and to improve upon previous models by using a large, pooled sample and by considering a wide range of candidate predictors, including medications.

METHODS: Harmonized data from two Dutch (LASA, B-PROOF) and one German cohort (ActiFE Ulm) of adults aged ≥ 65 years were used to fit two logistic regression models: one for predicting any fall and another for predicting recurrent falls over one year. Model generalizability was assessed using internal-external cross-validation.

RESULTS: Data of 5722 participants were included in the analyses, of whom 1868 (34.7%) endured at least one fall and 702 (13.8%) endured a recurrent fall. Positive predictors for any fall were: educational status, depression, verbal fluency, functional limitations, falls history, and use of antiepileptics and drugs for urinary frequency and incontinence; negative predictors were: body mass index (BMI), grip strength, systolic blood pressure, and smoking. Positive predictors for recurrent falls were: educational status, visual impairment, functional limitations, urinary incontinence, falls history, and use of anti-Parkinson drugs, antihistamines, and drugs for urinary frequency and incontinence; BMI was a negative predictor. The average C-statistic value was 0.65 for the model for any fall and 0.70 for the model for recurrent falls.

CONCLUSIONS: Compared with previous models, the model for recurrent falls performed favorably while the model for any fall performed similarly. Validation and optimization of the models in other populations is warranted.


Language: en

Keywords

Accidental falls; Prognosis; Fall-risk-increasing drugs; Individual participant data

NEW SEARCH


All SafetyLit records are available for automatic download to Zotero & Mendeley
Print