SAFETYLIT WEEKLY UPDATE

We compile citations and summaries of about 400 new articles every week.
RSS Feed

HELP: Tutorials | FAQ
CONTACT US: Contact info

Search Results

Journal Article

Citation

Aoyagi GA, Pinto RZ, Lemes R, Pastre CM, Eto BY, Faria MS, Morelhão PK, Franco MR. Physiotherapy 2022; 116: 50-57.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2022, Chartered Society of Physiotherapy London)

DOI

10.1016/j.physio.2022.02.006

PMID

35550487

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To investigate the relationship between FOF and self-reported physical activity levels among older adults.

DESIGN: Observational cross-sectional. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: Community-dwelling older adults aged 60 years and over and without cognitive deficits were recruited. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Data collected included cognitive function [i.e., Mini Mental Status Examination (MMSE)], FOF [i.e., Iconographic Falls Efficacy Scale (Icon-FES); Falls Efficacy Scale - International (FES-I)], self-reported physical activity (i.e., Modified Baecke Questionnaire for Elderly People), history of falls, number of comorbidities and clinical tests of balance and mobility (i.e., Short Physical Performance Battery and the single leg stance test with closed and opened eyes). Multivariable linear regression was used to test whether FOF predicts self-reported physical activity levels.

RESULTS: A total of 200 older adults living in the community were enrolled in this study. Our results showed that FOF, as measured by FES-I or Icon-FES, did not predict self-reported physical activity levels in community-dwelling older adults.

CONCLUSION: Our results did not support previous evidence that higher FOF predicts lower levels of self-reported physical activity. These results question the role of FOF in influencing self-reported physical activity levels among community-dwelling older adults.


Language: en

Keywords

Aged; Epidemiology; Accidental Falls; Exercise

NEW SEARCH


All SafetyLit records are available for automatic download to Zotero & Mendeley
Print