Citation

Gingerich DW, Scartascini C. J. Public Policy 2022; 42(2): 364-389.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2022, Cambridge University Press)

DOI

10.1017/S0143814X21000246

PMID

unavailable

Abstract

Anti-crime policy is often unresponsive to reductions in crime. To address why, we provide a model and empirical test of how citizens' anti-crime policy preferences respond to information. Our model shows that preferences for anti-crime policy hinge on expectations about the crime rate: punitive policies are preferred in high crime contexts, whereas social policies are preferred in low crime contexts. We evaluate these expectations through an information experiment embedded in the 2017 Latin American Public Opinion Project survey conducted in Panama. As expected by our theory, a high crime message induced stronger preferences in favour of punitive policies. Unanticipated by our theory, but in line with cursory evidence and survey results, we find that a low crime message did not induce stronger preferences in favour of social policies. These findings are consistent with policy ratcheting: punitive policies increase during periods of high crime and remain in place during periods of low crime.

Language: en

Keywords

anti-crime policy; endogenous preferences; information; Panama; survey experiment