SAFETYLIT WEEKLY UPDATE

We compile citations and summaries of about 400 new articles every week.
RSS Feed

HELP: Tutorials | FAQ
CONTACT US: Contact info

Search Results

Journal Article

Citation

Kahn C, Schultz C, Miller K, Anderson CL. Acad. Emerg. Med. 2007; 14(Suppl 1): S12–S13.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2007, Society for Academic Emergency Medicine, Publisher John Wiley and Sons)

DOI

10.1197/j.aem.2007.03.704

PMID

unavailable

Abstract

2007 SAEM Annual Meeting Abstracts

Objectives:The START system for mass casualty triagehas been widely used since 1983, but never field-testedfor accuracy. This study is the first outcomes-level assess-ment ever conducted following an actual mass casualtyevent to determine whether assigned triage levels corre-late with patient outcomes. The authors hypothesizedthat START achieved 90% sensitivity and 90% specificityfor each triage level.

METHODS:All triaged victims of an April 2002 train crashwere studied retrospectively. Patient records were re-viewed by the same two independent reviewers at eachhospital using a standardized tool and compared witha priori measures (modified from the Baxt criteria) defin-ing the appropriateness of each assigned triage levelusing an intention-to-treat analysis.

RESULTS:A total of 132 patients were seen at 9 hospitals,comprising 15 red, 60 yellow, and 57 green patients.Sixty-four (64) patients were triaged correctly as definedby outcomes criteria. Sixty (60) patients were overtriagedby 1 level, and 5 patients were overtriaged by 2 levels.Three (3) patients were undertriaged by 1 level. Some ofthe assigned triage levels differed from those whichshould have been assigned via strict application of STARTcriteria, based on review of out-of-hospital records. Sen-sitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictivevalues (and 95% CIs) for each triage level were...
Conclusions:This analysis demonstrates variable agree-ment between triage levels assigned by START and a priori outcomes criteria for each level. The ''walking fil-ter'' defining the green triage level functions well in rulingout serious injury. The red criteria approach hypothe-sized accuracy. Yellow criteria functioned poorly. A limi-tation is that the study could not differentiate betweenfailures of the methodology versus its inaccurate imple-mentation at the scene.


Language: en

NEW SEARCH


All SafetyLit records are available for automatic download to Zotero & Mendeley
Print