Citation

Koda M, Kondo K, Takahashi S, Ojima T, Shinozaki T, Ichikawa M, Harada N, Ishida Y. PLOS Glob. Public Health 2022; 2(8): e0000271.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2022, Public Library of Science)

DOI

10.1371/journal.pgph.0000271

PMID

unavailable

Abstract

Suicide prevention is a crucial policy issue in Japan to be addressed nationally. Nevertheless, if there are regional differences in suicide, even in adjacent sub-regions, measures may need to be taken at the sub-regional level. Previous studies have not compared regional differences in suicide based on the size of policy units, such as prefectures, secondary medical areas, and municipalities. This study used the number of suicides from open data for 10 years from 2009 to 2018 to obtain shrinkage estimates of the standardized mortality ratio (SMR) using the Bayesian hierarchical model. We visualized and compared the regional disparities in suicide for each policy unit. For each gender and policy unit, adjacent regions had similar clusters of SMRs and positive spatial autocorrelation of global Moran's I (p < 0.001 for each). Comparisons between each policy unit showed that even if the SMR was low for the prefectural units, there were regions with high SMRs in municipalities and secondary medical areas, and vice versa. It was found that assessing suicide solely on a prefecture-by-prefecture basis may overlook regional disparities in suicide. This research emphasizes the need to establish suicide indicators at the secondary medical or municipal level and execute individual suicide prevention interventions in neighboring communities. Prefectures can also play a role in developing collaborative cooperation between neighboring regions by acting as actors.

Language: en

Keywords

Cartography; Geographic distribution; Japan; Medical ethics; Spatial autocorrelation; Suicide; Transportation infrastructure; Urban infrastructure