SAFETYLIT WEEKLY UPDATE

We compile citations and summaries of about 400 new articles every week.
RSS Feed

HELP: Tutorials | FAQ
CONTACT US: Contact info

Search Results

Journal Article

Citation

Subotic J. J. Genocide Res. 2022; 24(1): 71-82.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2022, Informa - Taylor and Francis Group)

DOI

10.1080/14623528.2021.1979294

PMID

unavailable

Abstract

Over the past year, a series of controversies have erupted regarding the role of Holocaust scholars in determining whether other, more recent mass atrocities (in China, Myanmar, Syria, and elsewhere) amount to the category of genocide. In this Reflection, I turn to one such controversy: the attempt by Bosnian Serb political elites to use international Holocaust experts to determine that the most internationally visible mass crime of the Bosnian war - the genocide in Srebrenica in 1995 - did not, in fact, constitute genocide. I first provide the background to the controversy. I then explain why the finding of genocide for Srebrenica is so resisted in Republika Srpska (as well as in Serbia), by linking genocide denial to the way in which the Holocaust has been instrumentalized in the region. I conclude by considering the role international scholars of the Holocaust play in this epistemic contestation.


Language: en

Keywords

Bosnia; genocide; Holocaust; Serbia; Srebrenica

NEW SEARCH


All SafetyLit records are available for automatic download to Zotero & Mendeley
Print