CONTACT US: Contact info
|
Citation |
Willison CE, Singer PM, Creary MS, Vaziri S, Stott J, Greer SL. World Med. Health Policy 2022; 14(3): 490-506. |
|
Copyright |
(Copyright © 2022, Policy Studies Organization, Publisher John Wiley and Sons) |
|
DOI |
|
PMID |
36247081 |
|
PMCID |
|
|
Abstract |
COVID-19 is not the first, nor the last, public health challenge the US political system has faced. Understanding drivers of governmental responses to public health emergencies is important for policy decision-making, planning, health and social outcomes, and advocacy. We use federal political disaster-aid debates to examine political factors related to variations in outcomes for Puerto Rico, Texas, and Florida after the 2017 hurricane season. Despite the comparable need and unprecedented mortality, Puerto Rico received delayed and substantially less aid. We find bipartisan participation in floor debates over aid to Texas and Florida, but primarily Democrat participation for Puerto Rican aid. Yet, deliberation and participation in the debates were strongly influenced by whether a state or district was at risk of natural disasters. Nearly one-third of all states did not participate in any aid debate. States' local disaster risk levels and political parties' attachments to different racial and ethnic groups may help explain Congressional public health disaster response failures. These lessons are of increasing importance in the face of growing collective action problems around the climate crisis and subsequent emergent threats from natural disasters. Language: en |
|
Keywords |
race; disaster response; health policy; health politics |