Citation

Tremblay A, Schneider KJ, Yeates KO, Schneider G, Frémont P. J. Orthop. Sports Phys. Ther. 2022; ePub(ePub): ePub.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2022, Orthopaedic Section and Sports Physical Therapy Section of the American Physical Therapy Association)

DOI

10.2519/jospt.2022.11301

PMID

36484358

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Decision rules (e.g. Canadian CT Head Rule (CCHR) for adults and PECARN rule for children/adolescents) are used in emergency settings (ER rules) to assess traumatic brain injuries (TBI). The rules have a high sensitivity and near perfect negative predictive value that help to rule out more severe TBI.

CLINICAL QUESTION: Which criteria should be added to the Sport Concussion Assessment Tool 5 (SCAT5) to reach the sensitivity of the ER rules and improve the utility of the SCAT5 for screening for higher severity head and brain injuries?

KEY RESULTS: We performed a comparative analysis of the SCAT5 with the CCHR and PECARN rules. We compared the presence (yes or no) and comparative "face value" sensitivity (lower, identical, or higher) of the SCAT5 criteria to the ER rules criteria. Loss of consciousness, vomiting, severe/increasing headache, and seizure are SCAT "red flags" with similar or higher sensitivity compared to ER rules criteria. Five criteria had lower sensitivity or were absent from the SCAT. ER rules include any abnormality on the Glasgow coma scale (GCS <15), but only a "deterioration of the state of consciousness" is considered a "red flag" in the SCAT5. Persistent retrograde amnesia for more than 30 minutes, age >65, severity of the mechanism of injury, and signs of skull fractures are not mentioned in the SCAT5.

CLINICAL APPLICATION: We identified 5 criteria that could inform the evolution the SCAT5 to improve its ability to rule out more severe TBI in a sideline assessment context.

Language: en

Keywords

concussion; traumatic brain injury; TBI; diagnostic accuracy studies