SAFETYLIT WEEKLY UPDATE

We compile citations and summaries of about 400 new articles every week.
RSS Feed

HELP: Tutorials | FAQ
CONTACT US: Contact info

Search Results

Journal Article

Citation

Luo C, Ufongene C, Weintraub J. Torture 2022; 32(3): 84-88.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2022, International Rehabilitation Council for Torture Victims)

DOI

10.7146/torture.v32i3.132023

PMID

36519199

Abstract

Introduction to the reader In this case, a survivor of torture presents with symptoms clinically consistent with both major depressive disorder (MDD) and post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). During her evaluation, a validated psychological questionnaire for PTSD was administered verbally through a translator and accurately identified this diagnosis. However, a self-administered (read and completed by the client) questionnaire for MDD vastly underestimated the severity of her symptoms and failed to diagnose her with depression. The client had not completed grade school, so it is likely that her literacy level impacted the accuracy of this questionnaire. This highlights one of the many limitations that exist when administering psychological surveys. Through understanding these limitations, forensic evaluators can develop ways to identify, mitigate, and overcome limitations of these useful tools.


Language: en

Keywords

Humans; Female; Surveys and Questionnaires; *Torture; *Depressive Disorder, Major/diagnosis/psychology; *Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic/diagnosis/psychology; Literacy

NEW SEARCH


All SafetyLit records are available for automatic download to Zotero & Mendeley
Print