Citation

Pearson D, Hayward S, Blampied S. J. Criminol. Res. Policy Pract. 2022; 8(3): 196-208.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2022, Emerald Group Publishing)

DOI

10.1108/JCRPP-06-2021-0030

PMID

unavailable

Abstract

PURPOSE In intervening to prevent recidivism by adult firesetters, there is a dearth of standardised interventions and relatedly of controlled outcome evaluations. Although education is a common firesetter intervention, it is unclear if this changes behaviour of adults; a research situation the current study aimed to address.

DESIGN/METHODOLOGY/APPROACH The rate of actual fire recidivism of participants of a standardised educational programme was compared using Cooke's (1989) equation to expected rates based on the firesetting history of 93 referrals.

FINDINGS Results indicated a significant large effect for the difference between the frequencies of expected and actual firesetting re-offences. Research limitations/implications Limitations of the one-group pretest-posttest design are discussed with respect to potential confounds. Practical implications This paper adds to the literature on adult firesetter interventions and lends support to the use of fire education to prevent fire recidivism. It provides the first empirically validated example of a structured education programme for adult firesetters. Of interest to services piloting new intervention programmes, it reports an operationally efficient methodology for preliminary evaluation.

ORIGINALITY/VALUE To the best of the authors' knowledge, this is the first reported outcome study of a fire safety education programme for adults. The methodology adopted represents a means of preliminary evaluation in safety-critical areas where traditional evaluation designs are infeasible.

Language: en

Keywords

Arson prevention; Community corrections; Community safety; Crime prevention and reduction; Fire safety education; Firesetting; Realistic evaluation; Reducing recidivism